
According to Msnbc.com and several other top news sites, leading television evangelist and founder of the Regent University Pat Robertson is supporting Rudy Giuliani for president. According to a Newsmax.com article Robertson said that Giuliani was a proven leader who has a hopeful view over the future of this country: ”It is my pleasure to announce my support for America’s Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, a proven leader who is not afraid of what lies ahead and who will cast a hopeful vision for all Americans,” Robertson said during a news conference with Giuliani in Washington.
I was surprised to learn of this news. In my opinion, Robertson indirectly gave Giuliani his endorsement for president saying according to Nydaily.com that he thinks Giuliani would be a great leader of the United States: This is supposed to be a nonpolitical thing,” Robertson said in introducing Giuliani at a lecture series at the preacher’s Regent University here. “But we would be remiss to forget the fact that he seems to be running for President.” Robertson continued by saying, “And in point of fact,” added Robertson, a co-founder of the powerful Christian Coalition, “he may one day become not New York’s mayor, but America’s leader. So it’s a great pleasure to welcome a dear friend and a great leader.”
Although Robertson and Giuliani both favor a free capitalist society, Giuliani is not a social conservative like Robertson is. I supposed that Robertson would endorse Fred Thompson. Fred Thompson is number 2 in the polls. I think he can beat Giuliani in the polls and has a solid chance of becoming president. He is a conservative both economically and socially. That is not my opinion that is a fact according to On The Issues.org. I am going to show you a Giuliani’s liberal view on abortion and civil rights and then compare Thompson’s view of civil right. The following is a list Giuliani’s stance on abortion:Ultimate decision by woman, her conscience & her doctor. (Aug 2007)
Allowing choice keeps government out of people’s lives. (May 2007)
Giuliani donated to Planned Parenthood throughout 1990s. (May 2007)
Ok to repeal Roe v. Wade, but ok to view it as precedent too. (May 2007)
Allow states to fund or not fund abortion. (May 2007)
Pro-choice; no ban on partial-birth abortions. (Dec 1999)
Not let us look at Giuliani’s view on civil rights:
Supports domestic partnerships, but not same-sex marriage. (Aug 2007)
Don’t change gays-in-military policy in time of war. (Jun 2007)
Opposed Pres. Bush’s ban on gay marriage. (Jan 2007)
Pro gay rights. (Jul 2006)
Now let us look at Thompson’s view on abortion according to OnTheIssues.org:
Roe v. Wade was bad law and bad science. (Jun 2007)
Appoint strict constructionist judges. (Jun 2007)
Has never been pro-choice despite 1994 news reports. (Jun 2007)
Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
Voted YES on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
Now let us look at Thompson’s view on civil rights according to ontheissues.org:
Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
Voted NO on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
Voted NO on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit flag burning. (Dec 1995)
Voted NO on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
According to a quote by Centristcoalistion.com, Roberston has said that he disagrees with Giullani on some issues, but thinks that he could still run the country well. So why not pick someone that agrees with you in all your views(that I am aware of) like Thompson?\
Is there something Roberston does not like about Thompson? Or perhaps he does not think he can win? Either Thompson or Giullani can beat Clinton, so why pick a semi-conservative when you can pick a solid conservative?